My wife and I are currently watching the Nexflix show, “Nobody Wants This”. The show focuses on the growing romantic relationship between Joanne, played by Kristen Bell, and Noah, played by Adam Brody.
In the show, Joanne hosts a podcast with her sister Morgan (played by Justine Lupe) that talks about their romantic lives as single women living in Los Angeles. As luck would have it, Joanne is invited to a dinner party, where she meets Noah, who is revealed to be a rabbi.
The show is one of the few that talks openly about the Jewish faith and culture in modern in America. It was with that backdrop that got me thinking about one of the most central figures in philanthropy, Maimonides.
In the annals of Jewish intellectual history, few figures loom as large as Moses ben Maimon, more commonly known as Maimonides. Born in 12th century Cordoba, Spain, this polymath's contributions to philosophy, theology, and medicine continue to resonate in contemporary discourse. However, it is his profound impact on the conceptualization and practice of philanthropy that merits particular attention in our current socioeconomic climate.
Maimonides' life was marked by upheaval and adaptation. Forced to flee his native Spain due to religious persecution, he ultimately found refuge in Egypt, where he rose to prominence as both a communal leader and a court physician to Sultan Saladin. This dual role as a spiritual guide and a practical healer would significantly inform his approach to charitable giving.
Central to Maimonides' philanthropic philosophy is his seminal work, the Mishneh Torah. This comprehensive codification of Jewish law includes a detailed exposition on the nature and practice of charity. Maimonides posits a hierarchical structure of charitable giving, delineating eight distinct levels of tzedakah (righteousness or charity). This framework, revolutionary for its time, continues to influence modern philanthropic thought and practice.
The eight levels of tzedakah, in ascending order of virtue, are as follows:
Giving reluctantly or with regret
Giving less than one should, but doing so cheerfully
Giving after being asked
Giving before being asked
Giving when the donor does not know the recipient's identity, but the recipient knows the donor's identity
Giving when the donor knows the recipient's identity, but the recipient does not know the donor's identity
Giving when neither the donor nor the recipient knows the other's identity
Enabling the recipient to become self-reliant
This hierarchy represents a paradigm shift in the conceptualization of charity. In medieval society, charitable giving was often viewed through the lens of religious obligation or as a means of spiritual atonement. Maimonides, however, reframed charity as a tool for social justice and human empowerment. His highest form of charity—enabling self-sufficiency—reflects a remarkably modern understanding of sustainable development and social upliftment.
Maimonides' emphasis on anonymity in giving (levels 5-7) is particularly noteworthy. By prioritizing anonymous giving, he sought to preserve the dignity of the recipient and purify the motivations of the donor. This concept resonates strongly with contemporary discussions about effective altruism and the ethics of philanthropic recognition.
The practical implications of Maimonides' philosophy were far-reaching. In medieval Jewish communities, often marginalized and economically constrained, his teachings inspired a shift towards education and vocational training as forms of charitable intervention. This approach, focusing on long-term empowerment rather than short-term relief, presages modern philanthropic strategies that prioritize sustainable development and capacity building.
Maimonides' influence extends beyond his theoretical framework. As a physician, he exemplified his principles through pro bono medical care for the indigent. This integration of professional expertise with charitable intent foreshadows contemporary models of skilled volunteering and pro bono professional services.The legacy of Maimonides' philanthropic philosophy transcends cultural and religious boundaries. His emphasis on human dignity, self-sufficiency, and social responsibility has influenced diverse charitable traditions. The modern conception of philanthropy as an expression of "love for humanity" (derived from the Greek philanthropia) aligns closely with Maimonides' vision of charity as a selfless act of compassion and social justice.
In our current era, characterized by growing wealth disparities and complex social challenges, Maimonides' teachings offer valuable insights. His emphasis on empowerment over dependency, dignity over paternalism, and intention over recognition provides a compelling framework for evaluating and refining contemporary philanthropic practices.
As we navigate the complexities of modern giving—from casual acts of kindness to structured philanthropic initiatives—we are, perhaps unknowingly, engaging with concepts articulated by Maimonides nearly a millennium ago. His enduring influence serves as a testament to the timeless nature of thoughtful, ethical giving.
In conclusion, Maimonides' contributions to philanthropic thought represent a remarkable synthesis of ethical philosophy and practical wisdom. By challenging us to consider not just the act of giving, but its manner and ultimate impact, Maimonides continues to shape the landscape of charitable giving in the 21st century. As we grapple with persistent social inequities and seek sustainable solutions, the principles laid out by this 12th-century polymath offer both guidance and inspiration for the future of philanthropy.